Current:Home > reviewsThe FBI should face new limits on its use of US foreign spy data, a key intelligence board says -Trailblazer Wealth Guides
The FBI should face new limits on its use of US foreign spy data, a key intelligence board says
View
Date:2025-04-23 09:59:33
WASHINGTON (AP) — The FBI should stop using a U.S. spy database of foreigners’ emails and other communications for investigating crimes that aren’t related to national security, a group of White House intelligence advisers recommended in a report released Monday.
The President’s Intelligence Advisory Board’s findings come as the White House pushes Congress to renew Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act before its expiration at the end of this year. U.S. intelligence officials say Section 702 enables investigations of Chinese and Russian espionage, potential terrorist plots, and other threats.
But spy agencies also end up capturing the communications of U.S. citizens and businesses, and a series of intelligence mistakes at the FBI has fanned bipartisan criticism of the bureau that has strongly colored the debate over renewing the law.
The advisory board says the FBI made “inappropriate use” at times of Section 702 information. Those include queries for a U.S. senator and state senator’s names without properly limiting the search, looking for someone believed to have been at the Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection and doing large queries of names of protesters following the 2020 death of George Floyd.
“Unfortunately, complacency, a lack of proper procedures, and the sheer volume of Section 702 activity led to FBI’s inappropriate use of Section 702 authorities, specifically U.S. person queries,” the board said in its report. “U.S. person queries” generally mean searches for U.S. citizens and businesses.
The board recommends the FBI no longer search the data when it is seeking evidence of a crime not related to national security. Currently, the FBI conducts fewer than two dozen such searches a year, a senior administration official told reporters Monday. The official spoke on condition of anonymity under ground rules set by the White House.
The White House has not decided whether it will accept the recommendation but is studying the board’s work and report, the official said.
The board’s report largely lines up with the White House’s positions on other changes being debated in Congress. The board opposed requiring the FBI to obtain a warrant before it searches Section 702 data, saying that change would be impractical. It also says the FBI needs to maintain access to foreign spy collection because unlike other intelligence agencies, it has law enforcement authorities inside the U.S. and can warn Americans that they are being targeted by foreign spies or criminals.
Already, both Republicans and Democrats have called for broader changes affecting the FBI, including a handful of lawmakers in both parties who want to require warrants for any search.
Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., sharply questioned Assistant Attorney General Matt Olsen in June about how it searches Section 702 data and signaled he would push for new protections.
“I don’t think you’ve effectively made the case that there shouldn’t be a warrant requirement, whether or not it is constitutionally required, for a U.S. person search that is crime only,” he said.
Many in the GOP, meanwhile, are furious about the FBI’s investigations of former President Donald Trump and mistakes found by the Justice Department inspector general and other reviewers.
In a statement, the FBI said the report highlighted “how crucial” foreign intelligence was to the bureau’s mission.
“We agree that Section 702 should be reauthorized in a manner that does not diminish its effectiveness, as well as reassures the public of its importance and our ability to adhere rigorously to all relevant rules,” the bureau’s statement said.
veryGood! (7765)
Related
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- 2016: California’s ‘Staggering’ Leak Could Spew Methane for Months
- First 2020 Debates Spent 15 Minutes on Climate Change. What Did We Learn?
- Queen Letizia of Spain Is Perfection in Barbiecore Pink at King Charles III's Coronation
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- 2016: California’s ‘Staggering’ Leak Could Spew Methane for Months
- Anti-abortion groups are getting more calls for help with unplanned pregnancies
- Human Rights Campaign declares state of emergency for LGBTQ+ Americans
- Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
- Sea Level Rise Is Creeping into Coastal Cities. Saving Them Won’t Be Cheap.
Ranking
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- They were turned away from urgent care. The reason? Their car insurance
- Today’s Climate: June 11, 2010
- Pregnant Bachelor Nation Star Becca Kufrin Reveals Sex of First Baby With Fiancé Thomas Jacobs
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- City in a Swamp: Houston’s Flood Problems Are Only Getting Worse
- All the Jaw-Dropping Fascinators Worn to King Charles III’s Coronation
- Can therapy solve racism?
Recommendation
McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
In the Philippines, Largest Polluters Face Investigation for Climate Damage
House Oversight chairman to move ahead with contempt of Congress proceedings against FBI director
Calif. Lawmakers Rush to Address Methane Leak’s Dangers
Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
Why Prince Harry Didn't Wear His Military Uniform to King Charles III's Coronation
Musicians are back on the road, but every day is a gamble
Some don't evacuate, despite repeated hurricane warnings, because they can't