Current:Home > ScamsCalifornia lawmakers approve new tax for guns and ammunition to pay for school safety improvements -Trailblazer Wealth Guides
California lawmakers approve new tax for guns and ammunition to pay for school safety improvements
View
Date:2025-04-24 15:11:41
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California lawmakers on Thursday voted to raise taxes on guns and ammunition and use the money to pay for gun violence prevention programs and security improvements at public schools.
The federal government already taxes the sale of guns and ammunition nationwide. The government gives that money to the states, which spend it on wildlife conservation and hunter safety programs.
California’s proposed tax, if it becomes law, would be 11% — matching the highest tax imposed by the federal government on guns.
Most states don’t have a special tax just for guns. Pennsylvania collects a $3 surcharge on gun sales and uses the money to pay for background checks. Fees in California total more than $37 on gun sales, with most of that money covering the cost of background checks.
The bill — authored by Assemblymember Jesse Gabriel, a Democrat from Encino — cleared the California Senate on Thursday. It has already passed the state Assembly, but Assembly members must vote on it one more time before sending it to Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk.
“Don’t let politics stand in the way of saving the lives of our children and providing mental health care in our school districts,” Democratic state Sen. Anthony Portantino said. “Fear should not be on the brow of a parent when they send their kids to school.”
It’s unclear if Newsom will sign it into law. Newsom has opposed some high-profile tax increase proposals in recent years. But he has also been on a crusade to improve gun safety, signing a law last year that lets private citizens enforce the state’s ban on assault weapons by filing civil lawsuits against anyone who distributes the weapons, parts that can be used to build the weapons, guns without serial numbers, or .50-caliber rifles.
California’s proposed tax would not apply to people who buy the guns. Instead, the state would make the businesses that sell guns and ammunition pay the tax. However, most of the time businesses will raise prices to cover the cost of the tax. The tax would not apply to police officers and it would not apply to businesses with sales of less than $5,000 over a three-month period.
“It’s a poll tax. It’s a tax on exercising a constitutional right,” said Chuck Michel, president of the California Rifle and Pistol Association, who opposes the tax. “We’re going to have to file a lawsuit to challenge it.”
The federal tax on guns and ammunition has been in place since 1918 and has survived multiple lawsuits. But things changed last year when the U.S. Supreme Court imposed a new standard for interpreting the nation’s gun laws. The new standard relies more on the historical tradition of gun regulation rather than public interests, including safety.
A legislative analysis of the California proposal said it is an “open question” whether a lawsuit challenging the tax would be successful.
The tax would take effect on July 1 and would generate about $159 million in revenue annually, according to an estimate from the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration. The first $75 million of that money would go to the California Violence Intervention and Prevention Grant Program. In 2020, the program funded projects targeting young people in gangs, including sports programs, life coaching and tattoo removal.
The next $50 million would go to the State Department of Education to enhance safety at public schools, including physical security improvements, safety assessments, after-school programs for at-risk students and mental and behavioral health services for students, teachers and other school employees.
___
Associated Press reporter Trân Nguyễn contributed to this report.
veryGood! (1)
Related
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- 3 common thinking traps and how to avoid them, according to a Yale psychologist
- King Charles III and Queen Camilla Officially Crowned at Coronation
- Breaking Down Prince William and Kate Middleton's Updated Roles Amid King Charles III's Reign
- 'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
- Ukraine's counteroffensive against Russia appears to be in opening phases
- Judge temporarily blocks Florida ban on trans minor care, saying gender identity is real
- A box of 200 mosquitoes did the vaccinating in this malaria trial. That's not a joke!
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- 2015: The Year Methane Leaked into the Headlines
Ranking
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- 2016: When Climate Activists Aim to Halt Federal Coal Leases
- Merck sues U.S. government over plan to negotiate Medicare drug prices, claiming extortion
- Ethan Orton, teen who brutally killed parents in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, sentenced to life in prison
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Zoey the Lab mix breaks record for longest tongue on a living dog — and it's longer than a soda can
- The number of hungry people has doubled in 10 countries. A new report explains why
- Pregnant Bachelor Nation Star Becca Kufrin Reveals Sex of First Baby With Fiancé Thomas Jacobs
Recommendation
Travis Hunter, the 2
MTV Movie & TV Awards 2023 Live Show Canceled After Drew Barrymore Exit
Here's How Sarah Ferguson Is Celebrating the Coronation At Home After Not Being Invited
Inside Princess Anne's Unique Royal World
Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
Polar Bears Wearing Cameras and Fitbits Reveal an Arctic Struggle for Survival
Scientists debate how lethal COVID is. Some say it's now less risky than flu
Anti-abortion groups are getting more calls for help with unplanned pregnancies